Article image
Trusts & Estates

Nuances of Using Non-Judicial Settlement Agreements in Massachusetts Trust Administration

Multiple Authors

Trust administration does not always unfold exactly as the grantor envisioned. Changes in family dynamics, tax laws, beneficiary needs, or financial circumstances can expose ambiguities or inefficiencies in even the most carefully drafted trust. In Massachusetts, trustees and beneficiaries facing these challenges often assume that court involvement is inevitable.

In many cases, it is not.

Massachusetts law permits the use of Non-Judicial Settlement Agreements (NJSAs) as a flexible, efficient alternative to court proceedings for resolving certain trust-related issues. When used appropriately, NJSAs can preserve the grantor’s intent, reduce costs, and avoid the emotional toll of litigation—while still complying with fiduciary duties and statutory requirements.

This article explores how NJSAs function under Massachusetts law, the substantive issues they can address, their limitations, and best practices for trustees and beneficiaries considering their use.

What Is a Non-Judicial Settlement Agreement?

A Non-Judicial Settlement Agreement is a written agreement entered into by all interested parties to resolve any matters involving a trust—without court approval—as long as the agreement does not violate the trust’s material purpose or applicable law.

In Massachusetts, NJSAs are authorized under the Massachusetts Uniform Trust Code (MUTC). The statute reflects a policy preference for private resolution of trust matters where consensus is possible and judicial oversight is unnecessary.

Unlike court petitions, NJSAs are collaborative rather than adversarial. They allow trustees and beneficiaries to address problems pragmatically, provided that:

  • All required parties consent, and
  • The agreement respects the core intent and purpose of the trust.
Substantive Uses of NJSAs in Massachusetts Trust Administration
Modifying and Clarifying Trust Terms

One common use of an NJSA is to address ambiguities or gaps in trust documents. Even well-drafted trusts can contain provisions that are unclear, incomplete, or outdated when applied to real-world circumstances.

In Massachusetts, NJSAs may be used to:

  • Interpret or clarify ambiguous trust provisions
  • Add context where the trust document is silent on a particular administrative issue
  • Correct drafting errors that frustrate trust administration
  • Alter, supplement, or modify certain terms of an irrevocable trust, so long as the material purpose is preserved

These modifications can be especially valuable when ambiguity would otherwise force a trustee to seek court instructions.

Promoting the Trust’s Original Purpose When Circumstances Change

Trusts are often intended to function for decades. Over time, unforeseen events—changes in family structure, beneficiary health, financial conditions, or tax laws—can make literal compliance with trust terms impractical or counterproductive.

An NJSA may be used to:

  • Promote the trust’s original intent when current circumstances hinder proper performance
  • Update administrative provisions to reflect the evolution of the parties’ lives
  • Adapt trust operations to new factual realities without undermining the trust’s purpose

Massachusetts law recognizes that flexibility can be essential to honoring the grantor’s broader objectives.

Resolving Trustee and Beneficiary Disputes Without Litigation

Disputes among trustees or between trustees and beneficiaries are a common source of delay, expense, and emotional strain in trust administration. Litigation often exacerbates these problems rather than resolving them efficiently.

NJSAs can provide a constructive alternative by allowing parties to:

  • Resolve disputes without court involvement
  • Avoid the acrimony and rigidity of formal litigation
  • Reach mutually acceptable outcomes while maintaining family or professional relationships

When consensus can be achieved, an NJSA often results in faster and less costly resolutions than contested court proceedings.

Improving Trust Administration and Reducing Costs

Administrative inefficiencies can drain trust assets and burden trustees. NJSAs may be used in Massachusetts to streamline trust administration and reduce unnecessary expense.

Common administrative uses include:

  1. Changing administrative terms that no longer serve the trust efficiently
  2. Dividing or merging trusts to simplify management
  3. Providing direction regarding trustee compensation
  4. Providing for the succession of trustees
  5. Transferring the trust’s principal place of administration

These adjustments can significantly reduce administrative friction while remaining consistent with fiduciary obligations.

Strategic and Tax-Sensitive Planning Purposes

NJSAs may also support sophisticated planning objectives, provided they do not alter the trust’s material purpose.

Examples include:

  • Implementing tax minimization strategies consistent with the trust’s intent
  • Granting additional powers to a trustee to address changed circumstances
  • Directing a trustee to refrain from a particular act that would be impractical or harmful

In Massachusetts, careful drafting and legal review are critical to ensure that these strategies withstand scrutiny.

 

Trusts & Estates

Meet the authors

How NJSAs Can Enable a Better Process

For many families and fiduciaries, the benefits of NJSAs extend beyond legal efficiency.

When used properly, NJSAs can:

  • Avoid court involvement and the delays associated with judicial proceedings
  • Reduce legal fees and administrative costs
  • Minimize conflict, emotional stress, and adversarial dynamics
  • Encourage cooperation and problem-solving among interested parties
  • Provide expedient resolution of trust administration issues

These advantages are particularly meaningful in situations involving family trusts, where preserving relationships may be as important as resolving legal questions.

The Boundaries and Limitations of NJSAs in Massachusetts

While NJSAs can be wonderful tools, they are not without limits. Massachusetts law imposes clear boundaries to protect the integrity of trusts and the interests of beneficiaries.

  1. All Interested Parties Must Consent

An NJSA requires the consent or signature of all interested parties, which may include:

  • Trustees
  • Current beneficiaries
  • Remainder beneficiaries
  • The Attorney General if there is a charitable interest
  • Other parties with a present or future interest in the trust

If a required party does not consent, an NJSA may not be viable, and court involvement may be necessary.

  1. The Agreement Must Not Violate the Trust’s Material Purpose

A critical limitation is that an NJSA cannot violate the material purpose of the trust. This includes fundamental objectives such as:

  • Asset protection
  • Spendthrift provisions
  • Long-term support for a beneficiary
  • Preservation of assets for future generations

Agreements that undermine these core purposes risk being invalid or challenged.

When the Grantor Is Still Living

If the grantor of the trust is still alive, their participation can be highly beneficial. While not always required, having the grantor sign the NJSA and affirm that the agreement does not violate their intent can:

  • Strengthen the enforceability of the agreement
  • Reduce the risk of future disputes
  • Provide clarity regarding the trust’s material purpose

In Massachusetts practice, grantor involvement often adds a valuable layer of protection.

Best Practices for Trustees and Beneficiaries Considering an NJSA

Trustees considering an NJSA should proceed thoughtfully and with experienced legal guidance. Best practices include:

  • Evaluating whether the issue truly falls within the scope of an NJSA
  • Identifying all interested parties early in the process
  • Ensuring informed consent and clear documentation
  • Carefully analyzing the trust’s material purpose
  • Working with counsel experienced in Massachusetts trust administration

NJSAs are strategic tools—not shortcuts—and improper use can expose trustees to risk.

Conclusion: A Thoughtful Alternative to Court Intervention

In Massachusetts, Non-Judicial Settlement Agreements offer a valuable alternative for resolving trust administration issues efficiently and collaboratively. When used appropriately, they can preserve the grantor’s intent, reduce costs, and spare families and fiduciaries from unnecessary conflict.

However, their effectiveness depends on careful analysis, informed consent, and a clear understanding of both their power and their limits. With proper legal guidance, NJSAs can play a critical role in modern trust administration—serving both the trust’s purpose and the people it was designed to benefit.